Wednesday, 5 September 2012

MATCH DAY 3



MATCH DAY 3:
LIVERPOOL VS ARSENAL:
Two games into the season and no wins registered, it might be safe to say that Arsenal’s season had simply not started yet. Even worse, we were yet to score a goal, and having played Stoke and Sunderland (at home) that’s saying something. So it was fitting, then, that our next outing would be against a club with a somewhat similar story to ours, Liverpool. The clubs would face off both badly needing a result to kick-start their season, and the pressure told as both sides looked to impose themselves early on in the game. But one could distinctly tell that this game would be different from the first two for the Arsenal. While Stoke and Sunderland looked to defend from deep and were more than willing to let us dominate possession, Liverpool set out to compete in midfield and, with Joe Allen, control the game. From history, Arsenal plays better when put up against teams that play more open football, and this fixture turned out to be no different. Thirty-one minutes on the clock and a loose Steven Gerrard pass sets up a swift counter-attack for the Arsenal, with Podolski finding Cazorla and running into space to receive the return and smash the ball past a helpless Pepe Reina. Minutes later and it should have been 2-0, this time Diaby flying through the middle and slipping in Giroud in yet another counter-attack, only for the Frenchman to fire wide of the upright. This looked eerily like the missed Sunderland opportunity, with Giroud again making the right runs but simply lacking the composure to finish. Truth be told, he still looks (and plays) like he has the weight of the world on his shoulders. Or more like RvP’s 30 goals last season on his shoulders maybe. Anyway, heading into the break, despite Liverpool having played more football, we were ahead where it mattered most.
It was simply more of the same in the second half, where Liverpool’s passing was easy on the eye yet lacking in end-product, while our passing was both. Sixty-eight minutes in, and with Cazorla thriving in the spaces left by the Liverpool midfield, he profited from a Podolski through-ball to drive the ball hard and low past Reina and put give us a two-goal cushion. The final whistle was greeted with sighs of relief from the Arsenal fans worldwide and rightfully so. Two goals scored, none conceded, and two of the three new signings finally off the mark. We are currently the only team left that is yet to concede a goal. Another positive was the solid nature of our performance, especially in midfield with Arteta and Diaby providing a solid base from which to spring our attacks. Actually, goals aside, Diaby was the man-of-the-match for me. Wenger always said that a fit Diaby was the best midfielder in France, and coming off a performance like this it’s hard not to see why. Someone rightly said that he might be an upgrade on Alex Song. An imposing physical presence in midfield, strong on the ball, exceptional dribbling and an impressive awareness of everything that goes on around him, he might just go on to be the box-to-box midfielder that we’ve been lacking for a while now. This performance will have given him a great (and much needed) confidence boost, and he can only go up from here. It also goes to show us Gooners the value of being patient with a player, and vindicated Wenger’s choice to stick with him as well.



It would be cruel not to give a mention to Jenkinson for keeping Sterling in check for most of the game, though this appeared to have an adverse effect on his attacking as he spent most of his time keeping an eye on the tricky teenager. He also looked a little nervous with his clearances but an otherwise solid performance from him. His counterpart Gibbs, however, had no such worries, bombing forward at every available opportunity. This left Podolski having to sit that little bit deeper and defending against Borini and then Downing (not that difficult you would imagine though). Credit to our centre-back pairing for keeping a lid on Suarez, and to Steve Bould for yet another clean sheet. I’m beginning to wonder how long we can keep this up? With more illustrious opponents in the horizon, we might find out sooner rather than later.
With two of our new signings having opened their accounts however, all eyes will turn to Olivier Giroud. Yet another gilt-edged chance missed and people are beginning to talk. Is he good enough? Is the Ligue 1 too easy? Can he mix it with the big boys? Is he the next Chamakh? I say he needs to score, and soon, for his own good too. Any sort of goal, even a Gallas-esque goal off his back would do him a world of good in getting the monkey off his back. For the rest of us, we would do well to give him time (it’s sounding like a chorus now) to find his feet. We also need to work on our crossing, as many balls into the box were not good enough for Giroud to profit from.

This win puts us in good stead heading into the international break, and with Southampton coming next, our immediate future looks safe. Our fullbacks will have to defend from wider positions though, to prevent crosses coming in for Lambert, but otherwise we should be okay for this one.
One question though, this game proved that we play best when our opponents set up to play football. What happens when we come up against one that doesn’t, that will let us have the ball and won’t let us counter-attack? Up to you Mr. Wenger.

Oh, and our third-choice keeper now has more clean sheets than both Manchester clubs and TOTTENHAM HOTSPURS. Well I’m just saying…
Till next week then!

Tuesday, 21 August 2012

Matchday 1


ARSENAL VS SUNDERLAND
SATURDAY, 18/08/2012
Life after RvP and Song not off to the best of starts huh? So we did not win on Saturday, Podolski and Giroud didn’t score and we did not get off to a flying start like most of us thought we would. Look at the bright side though…RvP’s ambitions are not looking too good either! This was a winnable fixture, don’t get me wrong, but it was not the worst outing ever. Like a certain former rival that happened to lose 3-0 and had a man sent off. Or the other team somewhere in North London that lost 2-1. Or yet another of our rivals losing 1-0. Another positive is that it actually wasn’t one of those drab, uninspiring 0-0 stalemates, we dominated possession, created more chances, and we were generally on top from the offset (save for a few scares here and there).
I took some time out to pen a few lessons I picked up from this…ummm…humbling experience:

I.                    PATIENCE PAYS:
This is not a new concept to us, seeing as we have waited for seven years for silverware anyway. It’s a new season, it’s a new-look Arsenal and it’s only the first game of the Premier League. We should not have expected our new “Holy Trinity” (Podolski, Giroud, and Cazorla) to work miracles on their first outing. And in the same breath we should not be quick to vent our frustration at them and criticize them for not delivering at the first time of asking. It’s a marathon not a sprint (pardon the cliché) and our beloved team will deliver. We just have to keep the faith.

II.                  GIROUD MUST START:
Not to question your wisdom and vast years of experience Mr. Wenger, but using Olivier Giroud off the bench was not one of your brightest ideas. Giroud, in my humble opinion, is not an impact sub but a starter. I understand maybe Le Prof wanted to implement a “plan B” by introducing Giroud and pumping more crosses into the box, but he has the quality to figure productively in both plans, that is the usual Arsenal way of carving open defenses with the simplest of through balls, and the “long-ball, Stoke way” of doing things. His movement and link-up play are exquisite, and he is good in the air as well. Giroud should therefore start our next game and let Podolski attack from the left wing. This worked almost to perfection during our pre-season game against FC Cologne, why not try it again?

III.                TONE DOWN EXPECTATIONS:
So Le Prof deviates slightly from his norm of signing relatively unknown, young players who “have potential” and he actually goes out and signs players with PROVEN potential at the “big stage”… Lukas Podolski (100 caps for Germany), Olivier Giroud (top-scorer in French Ligue 1 last season) and Santi Cazorla (Euro 2008 and Euro 2012 winner with Spain). Add these to the already immensely talented squad we had and, understandably, expectations are high at the Emirates. So much so that you could feel the negative energy of disappointment flowing through the stadium once the final whistle went against Sunderland. Is this really the environment we want and expect our players to thrive under for the rest of the season? I mean, the team is already under enough pressure from the media and us expecting too much too soon from them just isn’t right. Our beloved team has been known to buckle under pressure, so let’s try not to add to that shall we?

IV.               GIVE CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE:
From the local joint where I was watching the game (and all over Twitter I imagine) a lot of vitriol was being sent the way of Diaby and Gervinho. People claim that Gervinho is too selfish, yet when he takes players on and beats them they are quick to praise him. How then do you expect him to beat players if he isn’t a little “selfish” at times? You want him to pass the ball more, yet when he does pass it you then lambast him for not taking the ball on himself. It’s a winger’s job to take risks and try to beat defenders one-on-one (and we all know Gervinho is good at that) so why don’t we let the man do his job? As for Diaby, the mistake most of us are making is trying to compare him to Alex Song. The thing is, no two players are alike. Diaby is no Song, just as Arteta is no Fabregas. Instead of focusing on his shortcomings as compared to Song then, why not praise him for what he’s good at? Like the way he can carry the ball forward better as compared to Song? Or the way he gets forward more often? Or the way he scores more? And besides, criticizing him or any other member of the team for that matter won’t help anyway.

V. A CHANGE OF FORMATION PERHAPS, MR. WENGER?
There is something that Jon Champion kept mentioning during our game, and that was that Santi was playing a little too far behind the game. I agree. For most periods of the match, Santi was playing too far behind to properly influence the game from an attacking point of view. As a result, Podolski was isolated up front and had to drop deep for the ball, or couldn’t get the ball at all. The fact that Walcott had an off-day didn’t help matters either. And in any case, lots of people drew comparisons between Cazorla and players of the same ilk as David Silva and Juan Mata, who play in more advanced roles for their clubs, so why not use him in the same way?
In order to improve things then, might I suggest a change of formation? A 4-2-3-1 perhaps? With Diaby and Arteta playing as the defensive midfield duo, Podolski and Walcott playing on the left and right respectively and Cazorla playing in the hole behind Giroud? We have used this before last season so it isn’t anything new, plus it plays to everyone’s strengths as well. Diaby and Arteta can complement each other both going forward and defending, and Cazorla can act as a pivot in attack. This means that he will be able to not only link the defensive duo to Giroud, but to Walcott and Podolski as well. It also means that Giroud won’t have to drop deep for the ball like Podolski had to.

I do hope that the team picks up its performances though, and especially for Giroud whom I think has the most to prove. The earlier he proves the doubters wrong and calms the fans’ nerves down the better I think.

Till next week then!